Immigrants from Central America vs Soviet Union Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Central America
Soviet Union
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Central America
Soviet Union
3.0%
HEARING DISABILITY
64.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
84.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
135th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Central America vs Soviet Union Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 535,995,824 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Central America and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.281 and weighted average of 3.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,504,651 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.185 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 2.7%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Central America | Soviet Union |
| Minimum | 0.32% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 14.7% | 6.1% |
| Range | 14.4% | 5.1% |
| Mean | 3.2% | 3.2% |
| Median | 2.8% | 3.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.3% | 2.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.2% | 3.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.87% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 1.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.4% | 1.0% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Central America by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Central America are Immigrants from Cambodia (3.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (3.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Japan (2.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Albanian (2.9%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (3.0%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Poland | 70.2 /100 | #156 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 69.6 /100 | #157 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 69.5 /100 | #158 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 67.4 /100 | #159 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 67.1 /100 | #160 | Good 2.9% |
| Albanians | 66.6 /100 | #161 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 64.9 /100 | #163 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 64.8 /100 | #164 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 64.2 /100 | #165 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 62.9 /100 | #166 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 58.1 /100 | #167 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 57.9 /100 | #168 | Average 3.0% |
| Arabs | 57.6 /100 | #169 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 56.9 /100 | #170 | Average 3.0% |
Demographics Similar to Soviet Union by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Ugandan (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 86.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 86.6 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |