Immigrants from Central America vs Chinese Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Central America
Chinese
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Central America
Chinese
3.0%
HEARING DISABILITY
64.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
289th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Central America vs Chinese Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 535,995,824 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Central America and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.281 and weighted average of 3.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,801,631 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.314 and weighted average of 3.7%, a difference of 24.6%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Central America | Chinese |
| Minimum | 0.32% | 0.63% |
| Maximum | 14.7% | 11.0% |
| Range | 14.4% | 10.4% |
| Mean | 3.2% | 4.4% |
| Median | 2.8% | 3.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.3% | 3.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.2% | 4.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.87% | 1.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 2.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.4% | 2.2% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Central America by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Central America are Immigrants from Cambodia (3.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (3.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Japan (2.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Albanian (2.9%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (3.0%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Poland | 70.2 /100 | #156 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 69.6 /100 | #157 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 69.5 /100 | #158 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 67.4 /100 | #159 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 67.1 /100 | #160 | Good 2.9% |
| Albanians | 66.6 /100 | #161 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 64.9 /100 | #163 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 64.8 /100 | #164 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 64.2 /100 | #165 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 62.9 /100 | #166 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 58.1 /100 | #167 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 57.9 /100 | #168 | Average 3.0% |
| Arabs | 57.6 /100 | #169 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 56.9 /100 | #170 | Average 3.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are White/Caucasian (3.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Finnish (3.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Irish (3.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Native Hawaiian (3.7%, a difference of 0.21%), and Norwegian (3.7%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Swedes | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Spanish | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Irish | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Chinese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Finns | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Native Hawaiians | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Norwegians | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Welsh | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 3.7% |