Immigrants from Panama vs Soviet Union Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Panama
Soviet Union
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Panama
Soviet Union
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
76.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
149th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
84.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
135th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Panama vs Soviet Union Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,167,736 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Panama and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.892 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,504,651 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.185 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 1.3%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Panama | Soviet Union |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 24.8% | 6.1% |
| Range | 23.7% | 5.1% |
| Mean | 6.0% | 3.2% |
| Median | 4.0% | 3.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.0% | 2.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.1% | 3.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.1% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.1% | 1.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.0% | 1.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Panama and Soviet Union by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Panama are Immigrants from Russia (2.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Tongan (2.9%, a difference of 0.25%), Brazilian (2.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Congo (2.9%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Bulgaria (2.9%, a difference of 0.33%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Ugandan (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
| Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |