Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Soviet Union Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Soviet Union
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Soviet Union
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
69.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
158th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
84.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
135th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Soviet Union Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 172,316,169 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.253 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,504,651 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.185 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 2.2%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar | Soviet Union |
| Minimum | 1.7% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 4.4% | 6.1% |
| Range | 2.7% | 5.1% |
| Mean | 3.0% | 3.2% |
| Median | 2.9% | 3.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.7% | 2.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.3% | 3.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.60% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.56% | 1.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.56% | 1.0% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar are Immigrants from Kazakhstan (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Poland (2.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Costa Rican (2.9%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Lebanon (2.9%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Australia (2.9%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
| Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154 | Good 2.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.4 /100 | #155 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 70.2 /100 | #156 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 69.6 /100 | #157 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 69.5 /100 | #158 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 67.4 /100 | #159 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 67.1 /100 | #160 | Good 2.9% |
| Albanians | 66.6 /100 | #161 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 64.9 /100 | #163 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 64.8 /100 | #164 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 64.2 /100 | #165 | Good 3.0% |
Demographics Similar to Soviet Union by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Ugandan (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 86.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 86.6 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |