Immigrants from Russia vs Soviet Union Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Russia
Soviet Union
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Russia
Soviet Union
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
77.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
84.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
135th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Russia vs Soviet Union Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 347,834,739 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Russia and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.303 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,504,651 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.185 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 1.1%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Russia | Soviet Union |
| Minimum | 0.87% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 18.5% | 6.1% |
| Range | 17.7% | 5.1% |
| Mean | 4.5% | 3.2% |
| Median | 3.3% | 3.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.7% | 2.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.7% | 3.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.9% | 1.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.8% | 1.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Russia and Soviet Union by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Russia are Immigrants from Panama (2.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Tongan (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Brazilian (2.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Congo (2.9%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Bulgaria (2.9%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Ugandan (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
| Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |