Icelander vs Colombian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Icelander
 Colombian
 Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Icelanders
Colombians
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
92.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
122nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
97.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
108th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Icelander vs Colombian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,642,692 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.148 and weighted average of 5.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 419,485,288 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Colombians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.221 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 1.4%.
 
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Icelander | Colombian | 
| Minimum | 0.47% | 1.5% | 
| Maximum | 16.5% | 10.0% | 
| Range | 16.1% | 8.5% | 
| Mean | 6.9% | 5.4% | 
| Median | 5.6% | 5.5% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.6% | 4.5% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.4% | 6.2% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 1.7% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 1.4% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 1.4% | 
Demographics Similar to Icelanders and Colombians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Costa Rican (5.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Russia (5.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (5.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Estonian (5.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and Norwegian (5.9%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Colombians are Uruguayan (5.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Netherlands (5.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Morocco (5.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (5.8%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Colombia (5.8%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability | 
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.4 /100 | #105  | Exceptional 5.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Morocco | 97.3 /100 | #106  | Exceptional 5.8%  | 
| Uruguayans | 97.2 /100 | #107  | Exceptional 5.8%  | 
| Colombians | 97.2 /100 | #108  | Exceptional 5.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.1 /100 | #109  | Exceptional 5.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Colombia | 96.7 /100 | #110  | Exceptional 5.8%  | 
| Danes | 96.6 /100 | #111  | Exceptional 5.8%  | 
| South Africans | 96.3 /100 | #112  | Exceptional 5.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 95.6 /100 | #113  | Exceptional 5.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Poland | 95.4 /100 | #114  | Exceptional 5.9%  | 
| South American Indians | 94.8 /100 | #115  | Exceptional 5.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Africa | 94.7 /100 | #116  | Exceptional 5.9%  | 
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.6 /100 | #117  | Exceptional 5.9%  | 
| Russians | 93.4 /100 | #118  | Exceptional 5.9%  | 
| Norwegians | 93.1 /100 | #119  | Exceptional 5.9%  | 
| Estonians | 92.9 /100 | #120  | Exceptional 5.9%  | 
| Costa Ricans | 92.6 /100 | #121  | Exceptional 5.9%  | 
| Icelanders | 92.6 /100 | #122  | Exceptional 5.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Russia | 92.4 /100 | #123  | Exceptional 5.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 92.2 /100 | #124  | Exceptional 5.9%  | 
| Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125  | Exceptional 5.9%  |