Japanese vs Australian Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Japanese
Australian
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Japanese
Australians
18.3%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
298th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.2%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
72.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Japanese vs Australian Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,155,070 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.112 and weighted average of 18.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,142,484 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.160 and weighted average of 17.2%, a difference of 6.4%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Japanese | Australian |
| Minimum | 3.7% | 7.1% |
| Maximum | 31.2% | 28.9% |
| Range | 27.4% | 21.7% |
| Mean | 18.9% | 16.1% |
| Median | 18.9% | 15.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.2% | 13.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.2% | 17.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.0% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.5% | 4.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 4.3% |
Similar Demographics by Cognitive Disability
Demographics Similar to Japanese by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Blackfeet (18.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Ghanaian (18.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Creek (18.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (18.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and German Russian (18.2%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #291 | Tragic 18.2% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #292 | Tragic 18.2% |
| Central American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #293 | Tragic 18.2% |
| British West Indians | 0.1 /100 | #294 | Tragic 18.2% |
| German Russians | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 18.2% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 18.2% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Japanese | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 18.3% |
Demographics Similar to Australians by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are American (17.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Latvia (17.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Yugoslavian (17.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Switzerland (17.2%, a difference of 0.030%), and Celtic (17.1%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.5 /100 | #153 | Excellent 17.1% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 79.3 /100 | #154 | Good 17.1% |
| Brazilians | 78.9 /100 | #155 | Good 17.1% |
| Sri Lankans | 78.9 /100 | #156 | Good 17.1% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 76.0 /100 | #157 | Good 17.1% |
| Celtics | 74.1 /100 | #158 | Good 17.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 73.2 /100 | #159 | Good 17.2% |
| Australians | 72.4 /100 | #160 | Good 17.2% |
| Americans | 72.2 /100 | #161 | Good 17.2% |
| Yugoslavians | 71.6 /100 | #162 | Good 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 71.5 /100 | #163 | Good 17.2% |
| Armenians | 70.1 /100 | #164 | Good 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 64.9 /100 | #165 | Good 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 64.4 /100 | #166 | Good 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 63.5 /100 | #167 | Good 17.2% |