Ecuadorian vs Australian Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Ecuadorian
 Australian
 Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Ecuadorians
Australians
17.2%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
59.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
170th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.2%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
72.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ecuadorian vs Australian Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,812,387 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.495 and weighted average of 17.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,142,484 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.160 and weighted average of 17.2%, a difference of 0.41%.
 
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ecuadorian | Australian | 
| Minimum | 6.5% | 7.1% | 
| Maximum | 22.2% | 28.9% | 
| Range | 15.7% | 21.7% | 
| Mean | 16.2% | 16.1% | 
| Median | 16.5% | 15.7% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.0% | 13.6% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.7% | 17.7% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 4.1% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 4.3% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 4.3% | 
Demographics Similar to Ecuadorians and Australians by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Tlingit-Haida (17.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Portugal (17.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants (17.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Turkey (17.2%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Syria (17.2%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are American (17.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Latvia (17.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Yugoslavian (17.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Switzerland (17.2%, a difference of 0.030%), and Celtic (17.1%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability | 
| Brazilians | 78.9 /100 | #155  | Good 17.1%  | 
| Sri Lankans | 78.9 /100 | #156  | Good 17.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Australia | 76.0 /100 | #157  | Good 17.1%  | 
| Celtics | 74.1 /100 | #158  | Good 17.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Latvia | 73.2 /100 | #159  | Good 17.2%  | 
| Australians | 72.4 /100 | #160  | Good 17.2%  | 
| Americans | 72.2 /100 | #161  | Good 17.2%  | 
| Yugoslavians | 71.6 /100 | #162  | Good 17.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 71.5 /100 | #163  | Good 17.2%  | 
| Armenians | 70.1 /100 | #164  | Good 17.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Albania | 64.9 /100 | #165  | Good 17.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 64.4 /100 | #166  | Good 17.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Syria | 63.5 /100 | #167  | Good 17.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 62.5 /100 | #168  | Good 17.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Portugal | 61.8 /100 | #169  | Good 17.2%  | 
| Ecuadorians | 59.6 /100 | #170  | Average 17.2%  | 
| Tlingit-Haida | 59.4 /100 | #171  | Average 17.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Turkey | 56.7 /100 | #172  | Average 17.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 50.2 /100 | #173  | Average 17.3%  | 
| Laotians | 50.0 /100 | #174  | Average 17.3%  | 
| Tsimshian | 49.8 /100 | #175  | Average 17.3%  |