Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Australian Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Trinidadian and Tobagonian
Australian
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Trinidadians and Tobagonians
Australians
17.9%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
0.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
245th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.2%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
72.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Australian Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,836,057 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Trinidadians and Tobagonians and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.120 and weighted average of 17.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,142,484 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.160 and weighted average of 17.2%, a difference of 4.1%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Trinidadian and Tobagonian | Australian |
| Minimum | 7.9% | 7.1% |
| Maximum | 29.8% | 28.9% |
| Range | 21.9% | 21.7% |
| Mean | 17.4% | 16.1% |
| Median | 17.8% | 15.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.5% | 13.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.2% | 17.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.7% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 4.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.8% | 4.3% |
Similar Demographics by Cognitive Disability
Demographics Similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians are Immigrants from Thailand (17.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Jamaican (17.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Samoan (17.9%, a difference of 0.090%), French American Indian (17.9%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Bangladesh (17.8%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| Cheyenne | 1.7 /100 | #238 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Cajuns | 1.4 /100 | #239 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Iraqis | 1.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Mexicans | 1.1 /100 | #241 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Paiute | 1.1 /100 | #242 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 1.0 /100 | #243 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Jamaicans | 0.9 /100 | #244 | Tragic 17.9% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.8 /100 | #245 | Tragic 17.9% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 0.8 /100 | #246 | Tragic 17.9% |
| Samoans | 0.7 /100 | #247 | Tragic 17.9% |
| French American Indians | 0.7 /100 | #248 | Tragic 17.9% |
| Cree | 0.7 /100 | #249 | Tragic 17.9% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 0.7 /100 | #250 | Tragic 17.9% |
| Malaysians | 0.6 /100 | #251 | Tragic 17.9% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.6 /100 | #252 | Tragic 17.9% |
Demographics Similar to Australians by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are American (17.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Latvia (17.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Yugoslavian (17.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Switzerland (17.2%, a difference of 0.030%), and Celtic (17.1%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.5 /100 | #153 | Excellent 17.1% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 79.3 /100 | #154 | Good 17.1% |
| Brazilians | 78.9 /100 | #155 | Good 17.1% |
| Sri Lankans | 78.9 /100 | #156 | Good 17.1% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 76.0 /100 | #157 | Good 17.1% |
| Celtics | 74.1 /100 | #158 | Good 17.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 73.2 /100 | #159 | Good 17.2% |
| Australians | 72.4 /100 | #160 | Good 17.2% |
| Americans | 72.2 /100 | #161 | Good 17.2% |
| Yugoslavians | 71.6 /100 | #162 | Good 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 71.5 /100 | #163 | Good 17.2% |
| Armenians | 70.1 /100 | #164 | Good 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 64.9 /100 | #165 | Good 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 64.4 /100 | #166 | Good 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 63.5 /100 | #167 | Good 17.2% |