Chippewa vs Yakama Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
COMPARE
Chippewa
Yakama
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Comparison
Chippewa
Yakama
18.0%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 25-34 YEAR OLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
320th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.6%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 25-34 YEAR OLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chippewa vs Yakama Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,001,722 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.510 and weighted average of 18.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,834,857 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Yakama and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.165 and weighted average of 17.6%, a difference of 2.2%.
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chippewa | Yakama |
Minimum | 7.5% | 2.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 62.5% |
Range | 92.5% | 60.4% |
Mean | 33.8% | 20.7% |
Median | 24.5% | 17.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.3% | 12.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 38.5% | 24.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 22.2% | 12.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 26.8% | 13.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 26.6% | 12.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa and Yakama by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Choctaw (18.1%, a difference of 0.22%), Menominee (18.0%, a difference of 0.26%), Ute (17.9%, a difference of 0.81%), Central American Indian (18.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and Seminole (18.3%, a difference of 1.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yakama are Dominican (17.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (17.6%, a difference of 0.22%), Arapaho (17.8%, a difference of 0.79%), Colville (17.5%, a difference of 0.90%), and Iroquois (17.5%, a difference of 0.98%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 17.0% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 17.0% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.1% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.2% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.3% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.5% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.5% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.6% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.6% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.6% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.8% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.9% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 18.0% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 18.0% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 18.1% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 18.2% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 18.3% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 18.4% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 18.5% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 18.9% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 19.1% |