Chippewa vs Yakama Single Mother Poverty
COMPARE
Chippewa
 Yakama
 Single Mother Poverty
Single Mother Poverty Comparison
Chippewa
Yakama
34.8%
SINGLE MOTHER POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
319th/ 347
METRIC RANK
36.4%
SINGLE MOTHER POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
327th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chippewa vs Yakama Single Mother Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 212,048,110 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among single mothers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.106 and weighted average of 34.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,786,189 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yakama and poverty level among single mothers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.043 and weighted average of 36.4%, a difference of 4.7%.
 
Single Mother Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chippewa | Yakama | 
| Minimum | 8.7% | 29.5% | 
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% | 
| Range | 91.3% | 70.5% | 
| Mean | 48.3% | 52.7% | 
| Median | 45.4% | 53.2% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 34.3% | 31.6% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 59.1% | 63.2% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 24.8% | 31.6% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.5% | 20.4% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.4% | 20.0% | 
Demographics Similar to Chippewa and Yakama by Single Mother Poverty
In terms of single mother poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Immigrants from Honduras (34.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Iroquois (34.8%, a difference of 0.24%), Cherokee (34.5%, a difference of 0.67%), Dominican (34.5%, a difference of 0.78%), and Hopi (34.5%, a difference of 0.90%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yakama are Choctaw (36.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Apache (36.6%, a difference of 0.53%), Native/Alaskan (36.6%, a difference of 0.64%), Creek (36.7%, a difference of 0.79%), and Dutch West Indian (36.8%, a difference of 1.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Mother Poverty | 
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #313  | Tragic 34.4%  | 
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #314  | Tragic 34.4%  | 
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #315  | Tragic 34.5%  | 
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #316  | Tragic 34.5%  | 
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #317  | Tragic 34.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #318  | Tragic 34.7%  | 
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319  | Tragic 34.8%  | 
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #320  | Tragic 34.8%  | 
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #321  | Tragic 35.1%  | 
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #322  | Tragic 35.2%  | 
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #323  | Tragic 35.5%  | 
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #324  | Tragic 35.5%  | 
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #325  | Tragic 35.7%  | 
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #326  | Tragic 35.8%  | 
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #327  | Tragic 36.4%  | 
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #328  | Tragic 36.4%  | 
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #329  | Tragic 36.6%  | 
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330  | Tragic 36.6%  | 
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #331  | Tragic 36.7%  | 
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #332  | Tragic 36.8%  | 
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #333  | Tragic 37.1%  |