Ethiopian vs South African Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Ethiopian
South African
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Ethiopians
South Africans
2.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
54th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.1%
HEARING DISABILITY
24.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
194th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ethiopian vs South African Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,190,203 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.218 and weighted average of 2.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,558,615 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.754 and weighted average of 3.1%, a difference of 15.0%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ethiopian | South African |
| Minimum | 0.17% | 0.31% |
| Maximum | 9.9% | 27.3% |
| Range | 9.7% | 27.0% |
| Mean | 2.5% | 5.7% |
| Median | 2.5% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.1% | 2.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.8% | 5.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.70% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 6.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 6.2% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Ethiopians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (2.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (2.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (2.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Jamaican (2.7%, a difference of 0.10%), and South American (2.7%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Israel | 99.3 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.3 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Immigrants | South America | 99.2 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Paraguayans | 99.2 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.2 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Jamaicans | 99.0 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Ethiopians | 99.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 99.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 99.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 98.6 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 98.5 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 98.5 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 98.4 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Demographics Similar to South Africans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Spanish American Indian (3.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Europe (3.1%, a difference of 0.21%), Macedonian (3.1%, a difference of 0.30%), Korean (3.1%, a difference of 0.37%), and Immigrants from Switzerland (3.1%, a difference of 0.51%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Blacks/African Americans | 34.7 /100 | #187 | Fair 3.0% |
| Mexican American Indians | 34.7 /100 | #188 | Fair 3.0% |
| Africans | 32.9 /100 | #189 | Fair 3.0% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 31.1 /100 | #190 | Fair 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 28.8 /100 | #191 | Fair 3.1% |
| Koreans | 27.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 3.1% |
| Macedonians | 27.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 3.1% |
| South Africans | 24.5 /100 | #194 | Fair 3.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 24.1 /100 | #195 | Fair 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 22.9 /100 | #196 | Fair 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 20.6 /100 | #197 | Fair 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 20.5 /100 | #198 | Fair 3.1% |
| Syrians | 19.2 /100 | #199 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 19.1 /100 | #200 | Poor 3.1% |
| Iraqis | 19.0 /100 | #201 | Poor 3.1% |