Chickasaw vs Hmong Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Hmong
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Chickasaw
Hmong
18.5%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
312th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.4%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
311th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Hmong Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,689,565 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.293 and weighted average of 18.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,607,802 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.446 and weighted average of 18.4%, a difference of 0.29%.

Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Hmong |
Minimum | 5.7% | 7.3% |
Maximum | 42.5% | 36.1% |
Range | 36.8% | 28.8% |
Mean | 18.7% | 18.0% |
Median | 18.5% | 17.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.9% | 15.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.0% | 19.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.1% | 4.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.9% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 4.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Hmong by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Yaqui (18.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Subsaharan African (18.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Choctaw (18.4%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Dominica (18.6%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Middle Africa (18.6%, a difference of 0.43%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Hmong are Choctaw (18.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Yaqui (18.5%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (18.4%, a difference of 0.40%), Immigrants from Western Africa (18.4%, a difference of 0.44%), and Subsaharan African (18.5%, a difference of 0.45%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 18.3% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 18.3% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 18.3% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 18.3% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 18.3% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 18.3% |
Ugandans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 18.3% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 18.4% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 18.4% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 18.4% |
Hmong | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 18.4% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 18.5% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 18.5% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 18.5% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 18.6% |
Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 18.6% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 18.6% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 18.6% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 18.6% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 18.6% |