Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Middle Africa
18.5%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
312th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.6%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
316th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,689,565 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.293 and weighted average of 18.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,719,317 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.009 and weighted average of 18.6%, a difference of 0.43%.

Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Middle Africa |
Minimum | 5.7% | 10.9% |
Maximum | 42.5% | 25.3% |
Range | 36.8% | 14.4% |
Mean | 18.7% | 17.9% |
Median | 18.5% | 18.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.9% | 16.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.0% | 18.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.1% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.9% | 2.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 2.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Immigrants from Middle Africa by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Yaqui (18.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Subsaharan African (18.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Hmong (18.4%, a difference of 0.29%), Choctaw (18.4%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Dominica (18.6%, a difference of 0.35%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are Immigrants from Dominica (18.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Liberian (18.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Bangladeshi (18.6%, a difference of 0.20%), Comanche (18.6%, a difference of 0.24%), and Subsaharan African (18.5%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 18.3% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 18.3% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 18.3% |
Ugandans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 18.3% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 18.4% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 18.4% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 18.4% |
Hmong | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 18.4% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 18.5% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 18.5% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 18.5% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 18.6% |
Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 18.6% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 18.6% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 18.6% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 18.6% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 18.7% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 18.7% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 18.7% |