Chickasaw vs Japanese Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Japanese
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Chickasaw
Japanese
18.5%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
312th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.3%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
298th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Japanese Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,689,565 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.293 and weighted average of 18.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,155,070 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.112 and weighted average of 18.3%, a difference of 1.3%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Japanese |
| Minimum | 5.7% | 3.7% |
| Maximum | 42.5% | 31.2% |
| Range | 36.8% | 27.4% |
| Mean | 18.7% | 18.9% |
| Median | 18.5% | 18.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.9% | 17.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.0% | 21.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.1% | 4.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.9% | 4.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 4.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Japanese by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Yaqui (18.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Subsaharan African (18.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Hmong (18.4%, a difference of 0.29%), Choctaw (18.4%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Dominica (18.6%, a difference of 0.35%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Blackfeet (18.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Ghanaian (18.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Creek (18.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (18.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and German Russian (18.2%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| German Russians | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 18.2% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 18.2% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Japanese | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Ugandans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Hmong | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 18.6% |