Celtic vs Immigrants from the Azores Vision Disability
COMPARE
Celtic
Immigrants from the Azores
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Celtics
Immigrants from the Azores
2.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
269th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
271st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Celtic vs Immigrants from the Azores Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,807,792 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.062 and weighted average of 2.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,255,686 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from the Azores and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.104 and weighted average of 2.4%, a difference of 0.16%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Celtic | Immigrants from the Azores |
| Minimum | 0.40% | 0.57% |
| Maximum | 12.3% | 5.4% |
| Range | 11.9% | 4.8% |
| Mean | 3.6% | 2.1% |
| Median | 2.8% | 2.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.3% | 1.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.2% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 0.89% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.2% | 0.85% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.2% | 0.84% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics and Immigrants from the Azores by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Cuban (2.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Senegalese (2.4%, a difference of 0.27%), Spaniard (2.4%, a difference of 0.27%), Ute (2.4%, a difference of 0.36%), and Mexican American Indian (2.4%, a difference of 0.37%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from the Azores are Spaniard (2.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Cuban (2.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Bahamas (2.4%, a difference of 0.43%), Senegalese (2.4%, a difference of 0.44%), and Ute (2.4%, a difference of 0.52%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Belizeans | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Fijians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Ute | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Senegalese | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Celtics | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Cubans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Spaniards | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Spanish | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Nepalese | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 2.4% |