Celtic vs Immigrants from Bahamas Vision Disability
COMPARE
Celtic
Immigrants from Bahamas
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Celtics
Immigrants from Bahamas
2.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
269th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Celtic vs Immigrants from Bahamas Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,807,792 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.062 and weighted average of 2.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,644,216 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bahamas and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.058 and weighted average of 2.4%, a difference of 0.60%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Celtic | Immigrants from Bahamas |
| Minimum | 0.40% | 0.51% |
| Maximum | 12.3% | 6.2% |
| Range | 11.9% | 5.7% |
| Mean | 3.6% | 2.7% |
| Median | 2.8% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.3% | 2.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.2% | 3.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 0.70% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.2% | 0.89% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.2% | 0.88% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics and Immigrants from Bahamas by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Cuban (2.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from the Azores (2.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Senegalese (2.4%, a difference of 0.27%), Spaniard (2.4%, a difference of 0.27%), and Ute (2.4%, a difference of 0.36%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bahamas are Immigrants from Latin America (2.4%, a difference of 0.31%), Spaniard (2.4%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from the Azores (2.4%, a difference of 0.43%), Cuban (2.4%, a difference of 0.59%), and Chippewa (2.4%, a difference of 0.63%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Fijians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Ute | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Senegalese | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Celtics | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Cubans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Spaniards | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Spanish | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Nepalese | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 2.4% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 2.5% |