Belizean vs White/Caucasian Vision Disability
COMPARE
Belizean
 White/Caucasian
 Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Belizeans
Whites/Caucasians
2.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
260th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
259th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Belizean vs White/Caucasian Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,166,801 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Belizeans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.135 and weighted average of 2.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 580,529,348 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.619 and weighted average of 2.4%, a difference of 0.17%.
 
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Belizean | White/Caucasian | 
| Minimum | 0.11% | 2.0% | 
| Maximum | 6.1% | 4.3% | 
| Range | 6.0% | 2.2% | 
| Mean | 2.6% | 2.6% | 
| Median | 2.6% | 2.5% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 2.3% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.9% | 2.8% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.76% | 0.50% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.1% | 0.41% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.1% | 0.41% | 
Demographics Similar to Belizeans and Whites/Caucasians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Belizeans are British West Indian (2.4%, a difference of 0.18%), West Indian (2.4%, a difference of 0.21%), Fijian (2.4%, a difference of 0.21%), Jamaican (2.4%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Haiti (2.4%, a difference of 0.29%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are British West Indian (2.4%, a difference of 0.010%), West Indian (2.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Haiti (2.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Fijian (2.4%, a difference of 0.38%), and Jamaican (2.4%, a difference of 0.41%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability | 
| Liberians | 0.5 /100 | #249  | Tragic 2.3%  | 
| Bangladeshis | 0.5 /100 | #250  | Tragic 2.3%  | 
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.4 /100 | #251  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.3 /100 | #252  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| Japanese | 0.3 /100 | #253  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| Haitians | 0.3 /100 | #254  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.3 /100 | #255  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Haiti | 0.2 /100 | #256  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| West Indians | 0.2 /100 | #257  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| British West Indians | 0.2 /100 | #258  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.2 /100 | #259  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| Belizeans | 0.2 /100 | #260  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| Fijians | 0.1 /100 | #261  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #262  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.1 /100 | #263  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #264  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #265  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #266  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| Ute | 0.1 /100 | #267  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| Senegalese | 0.1 /100 | #268  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| Celtics | 0.1 /100 | #269  | Tragic 2.4%  |