West Indian vs White/Caucasian Vision Disability
COMPARE
West Indian
White/Caucasian
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
West Indians
Whites/Caucasians
2.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
257th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
259th/ 347
METRIC RANK
West Indian vs White/Caucasian Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,927,950 people shows no correlation between the proportion of West Indians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.021 and weighted average of 2.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 580,529,348 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.619 and weighted average of 2.4%, a difference of 0.040%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | West Indian | White/Caucasian |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 2.0% |
| Maximum | 5.0% | 4.3% |
| Range | 3.9% | 2.2% |
| Mean | 2.4% | 2.6% |
| Median | 2.5% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.9% | 2.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.6% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.71% | 0.50% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.83% | 0.41% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.82% | 0.41% |
Demographics Similar to West Indians and Whites/Caucasians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to West Indians are British West Indian (2.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Haiti (2.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Belizean (2.4%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Guatemala (2.4%, a difference of 0.40%), and Fijian (2.4%, a difference of 0.42%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are British West Indian (2.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Haiti (2.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Belizean (2.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Fijian (2.4%, a difference of 0.38%), and Jamaican (2.4%, a difference of 0.41%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.5 /100 | #248 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Liberians | 0.5 /100 | #249 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.5 /100 | #250 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.4 /100 | #251 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Japanese | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Haitians | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 2.4% |
| West Indians | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 2.4% |
| British West Indians | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Belizeans | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Fijians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Ute | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Senegalese | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 2.4% |