Bahamian vs South American Indian Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Bahamian
South American Indian
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Bahamians
South American Indians
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
88.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
86.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bahamian vs South American Indian Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,647,902 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Bahamians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.137 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,558,216 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.457 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 0.40%.

Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bahamian | South American Indian |
Minimum | 0.49% | 0.098% |
Maximum | 8.0% | 16.3% |
Range | 7.5% | 16.2% |
Mean | 2.8% | 4.1% |
Median | 2.7% | 4.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 2.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.3% | 4.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 2.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 2.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 2.6% |
Demographics Similar to Bahamians and South American Indians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Bahamians are Immigrants from Zaire (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Albania (2.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Liberian (2.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Cuban (2.8%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Sudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Immigrants from Western Asia (2.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Uganda (2.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Vietnam (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Kenya (2.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and Chilean (2.9%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Latin America | 90.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 90.3 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 90.0 /100 | #117 | Excellent 2.8% |
Zimbabweans | 89.9 /100 | #118 | Excellent 2.8% |
Kenyans | 89.8 /100 | #119 | Excellent 2.8% |
Jordanians | 89.5 /100 | #120 | Excellent 2.8% |
Cubans | 89.4 /100 | #121 | Excellent 2.8% |
Liberians | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 2.8% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 88.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 2.9% |
Bahamians | 88.6 /100 | #124 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Albania | 88.5 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 87.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.9% |
South American Indians | 86.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 86.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 86.6 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.9% |
Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |
Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |