Bahamian vs Immigrants from Denmark Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Bahamian
Immigrants from Denmark
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Bahamians
Immigrants from Denmark
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
88.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.1%
HEARING DISABILITY
16.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
203rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bahamian vs Immigrants from Denmark Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,647,902 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Bahamians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.137 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,425,612 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Denmark and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.105 and weighted average of 3.1%, a difference of 9.1%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bahamian | Immigrants from Denmark |
| Minimum | 0.49% | 0.58% |
| Maximum | 8.0% | 12.5% |
| Range | 7.5% | 12.0% |
| Mean | 2.8% | 4.0% |
| Median | 2.7% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 2.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.3% | 5.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 2.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 2.3% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Bahamians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Bahamians are Immigrants from Zaire (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Albania (2.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Liberian (2.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Cuban (2.8%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Sudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 90.0 /100 | #117 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Zimbabweans | 89.9 /100 | #118 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Kenyans | 89.8 /100 | #119 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Jordanians | 89.5 /100 | #120 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Cubans | 89.4 /100 | #121 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Liberians | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 88.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bahamians | 88.6 /100 | #124 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 88.5 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 87.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.9% |
| South American Indians | 86.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 86.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 86.6 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Denmark by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Denmark are Immigrants from Thailand (3.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (3.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Alsatian (3.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Eastern European (3.1%, a difference of 0.12%), and Hispanic or Latino (3.1%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Europe | 22.9 /100 | #196 | Fair 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 20.6 /100 | #197 | Fair 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 20.5 /100 | #198 | Fair 3.1% |
| Syrians | 19.2 /100 | #199 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 19.1 /100 | #200 | Poor 3.1% |
| Iraqis | 19.0 /100 | #201 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 16.4 /100 | #202 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 16.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 15.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 3.1% |
| Alsatians | 15.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 3.1% |
| Eastern Europeans | 15.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 3.1% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 12.7 /100 | #208 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 12.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 3.1% |
| Cape Verdeans | 12.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 3.1% |