Alaskan Athabascan vs Choctaw Male Disability
COMPARE
Alaskan Athabascan
Choctaw
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Alaskan Athabascans
Choctaw
14.9%
MALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
336th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.4%
MALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alaskan Athabascan vs Choctaw Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,820,726 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.160 and weighted average of 14.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,660,738 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.087 and weighted average of 15.4%, a difference of 3.3%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Alaskan Athabascan | Choctaw |
| Minimum | 5.8% | 6.3% |
| Maximum | 50.7% | 44.2% |
| Range | 44.9% | 38.0% |
| Mean | 20.7% | 23.1% |
| Median | 18.5% | 22.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.9% | 19.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 26.7% | 27.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.8% | 7.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.2% | 7.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.1% | 6.9% |
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans and Choctaw by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Dutch West Indian (14.8%, a difference of 0.46%), Cherokee (14.8%, a difference of 0.49%), Menominee (15.0%, a difference of 0.51%), Pueblo (15.0%, a difference of 0.62%), and Yuman (14.7%, a difference of 1.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Kiowa (15.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Creek (15.5%, a difference of 0.85%), Puerto Rican (15.6%, a difference of 0.98%), Lumbee (15.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and Tsimshian (15.6%, a difference of 1.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 17.4% |