Scottish vs South African Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Scottish
 South African
 Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Scottish
South Africans
16.9%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
95.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.9%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
95.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
119th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Scottish vs South African Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 566,987,666 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.248 and weighted average of 16.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,593,753 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.053 and weighted average of 16.9%, a difference of 0.080%.
 
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Scottish | South African | 
| Minimum | 2.1% | 2.5% | 
| Maximum | 50.0% | 19.8% | 
| Range | 47.9% | 17.3% | 
| Mean | 18.2% | 12.8% | 
| Median | 16.3% | 12.9% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.2% | 11.2% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.5% | 15.8% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.3% | 4.7% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.1% | 4.2% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.0% | 4.1% | 
Demographics Similar to Scottish and South Africans by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Scottish are Immigrants from China (16.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Western Europe (16.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Portuguese (16.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Turkish (16.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and Scandinavian (16.9%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Immigrants from China (16.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Western Europe (16.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Japan (16.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Denmark (16.9%, a difference of 0.13%), and Portuguese (16.9%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability | 
| Albanians | 97.3 /100 | #109  | Exceptional 16.8%  | 
| Arapaho | 97.3 /100 | #110  | Exceptional 16.8%  | 
| Uruguayans | 97.2 /100 | #111  | Exceptional 16.8%  | 
| Indians (Asian) | 97.2 /100 | #112  | Exceptional 16.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 97.1 /100 | #113  | Exceptional 16.8%  | 
| Koreans | 97.1 /100 | #114  | Exceptional 16.8%  | 
| Yup'ik | 96.9 /100 | #115  | Exceptional 16.9%  | 
| Inupiat | 96.5 /100 | #116  | Exceptional 16.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Japan | 96.2 /100 | #117  | Exceptional 16.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Denmark | 96.2 /100 | #118  | Exceptional 16.9%  | 
| South Africans | 95.5 /100 | #119  | Exceptional 16.9%  | 
| Scottish | 95.0 /100 | #120  | Exceptional 16.9%  | 
| Immigrants | China | 94.9 /100 | #121  | Exceptional 16.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 94.8 /100 | #122  | Exceptional 16.9%  | 
| Portuguese | 94.7 /100 | #123  | Exceptional 16.9%  | 
| Turks | 94.5 /100 | #124  | Exceptional 16.9%  | 
| Scandinavians | 94.1 /100 | #125  | Exceptional 16.9%  | 
| Europeans | 93.4 /100 | #126  | Exceptional 17.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 93.1 /100 | #127  | Exceptional 17.0%  | 
| Nicaraguans | 93.0 /100 | #128  | Exceptional 17.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 92.9 /100 | #129  | Exceptional 17.0%  |