Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Scandinavian Family Households with Children

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 172,235,396 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.087 and weighted average of 28.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 472,042,007 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Scandinavians and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.611 and weighted average of 28.0%, a difference of 0.11%.

Family Households with Children Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar	Scandinavian
Minimum	12.1%	8.1%
Maximum	44.7%	100.0%
Range	32.6%	91.9%
Mean	29.5%	32.9%
Median	28.3%	28.0%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	26.9%	23.4%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	33.1%	36.4%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	6.2%	13.0%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	5.7%	18.1%
Standard Deviation (Population)	5.6%	17.9%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Scandinavians by Family Households with Children

In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar are Immigrants from Uganda (28.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Tohono O'odham (28.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Spaniard (28.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South America (28.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Middle Africa (28.0%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Scandinavians are Immigrants from Middle Africa (28.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Arab (28.0%, a difference of 0.030%), South American Indian (28.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Spaniard (28.0%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Africa (28.0%, a difference of 0.060%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Family Households with Children
Immigrants \| Azores	98.8 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 28.1%
Indonesians	98.8 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 28.1%
Immigrants \| Oceania	98.8 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 28.1%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	98.7 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 28.1%
Palestinians	98.5 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 28.1%
Sioux	98.3 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 28.1%
Choctaw	98.3 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 28.1%
Immigrants \| South America	98.0 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Uganda	97.7 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	97.7 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 28.0%
Tohono O'odham	97.6 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 28.0%
Spaniards	97.4 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 28.0%
Scandinavians	97.1 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Middle Africa	97.0 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 28.0%
Arabs	97.0 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 28.0%
South American Indians	96.9 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Africa	96.8 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 28.0%
Pakistanis	96.0 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 27.9%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	95.9 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 27.9%
Central American Indians	95.9 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 27.9%
Zimbabweans	95.6 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 27.9%