Immigrants from France vs Immigrants from Nigeria Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 194,223,200 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nigeria within Immigrant from France communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.426. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from France within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.110% in Immigrants from Nigeria. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from France corresponds to an increase of 109.8 Immigrants from Nigeria.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Nigeria communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($54,557 compared to $40,339, a difference of 35.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,257 compared to $86,589, a difference of 25.0%), and median family income ($120,076 compared to $96,439, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,805 compared to $49,174, a difference of 9.4%), median female earnings ($44,541 compared to $39,294, a difference of 13.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,826 compared to $58,942, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Nigeria communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 30.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 25.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.9% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.82%), single father poverty (16.1% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Nigeria communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 20.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 18.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.96%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Nigeria communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 66.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.080%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Nigeria communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 40.6%), births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 22.2%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.3%), family households (61.3% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 5.1%), and married-couple households (45.4% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Nigeria communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 9.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 7.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.1% compared to 88.2%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 52.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Nigeria communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 66.6%), doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 63.1%), and master's degree (20.3% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 39.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.68%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.69%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Nigeria communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 14.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 13.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 1.1%), disability (11.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and female disability (11.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 3.3%).