Immigrants from France vs Immigrants from Poland Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,997,545 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Poland within Immigrant from France communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.976. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from France within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.834% in Immigrants from Poland. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from France corresponds to an increase of 833.6 Immigrants from Poland.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Poland communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($54,557 compared to $45,979, a difference of 18.7%), median family income ($120,076 compared to $108,570, a difference of 10.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,826 compared to $61,041, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 2.4%), householder income under 25 years ($53,805 compared to $55,474, a difference of 3.1%), and median household income ($96,743 compared to $90,549, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Poland communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.4% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 24.9%), male poverty (10.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 11.4%), and poverty (11.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 2.0%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.7% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Poland communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 15.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 12.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.090%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Poland communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 6.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 0.89%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Poland communities in the United States are seen in family households (61.3% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 6.4%), married-couple households (45.4% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 5.8%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 0.32%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.57%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Poland communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 22.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 5.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 54.6%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.1% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 2.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 54.6%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Poland communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 71.5%), professional degree (6.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 59.5%), and master's degree (20.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.8% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.25%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.26%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Poland communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 7.8%), cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 7.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.34%), male disability (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.38%), and disability (11.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.57%).