Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Sudanese Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Sudanese
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Sudanese
28.4%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
65th/ 347
METRIC RANK
32.4%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
27.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
194th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Sudanese Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 184,731,208 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.608 and weighted average of 28.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,881,308 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.055 and weighted average of 32.4%, a difference of 14.1%.
Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Sudanese |
Minimum | 5.1% | 2.2% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 64.6% |
Range | 94.9% | 62.4% |
Mean | 42.1% | 33.6% |
Median | 35.5% | 31.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 25.2% | 26.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 53.6% | 42.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 28.5% | 15.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 25.4% | 12.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 25.1% | 12.6% |
Similar Demographics by Births to Unmarried Women
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Tongan (28.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Egypt (28.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Palestinian (28.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Europe (28.4%, a difference of 0.18%), and Bolivian (28.5%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
Immigrants | Albania | 99.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 28.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 99.1 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 99.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Egyptians | 99.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 98.9 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 28.3% |
Tongans | 98.8 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 28.4% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.8 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 28.4% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 98.8 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 28.4% |
Palestinians | 98.7 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 28.4% |
Immigrants | Europe | 98.7 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 28.4% |
Bolivians | 98.7 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 28.5% |
Laotians | 98.6 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 28.5% |
Jordanians | 98.5 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 28.5% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 98.5 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 28.5% |
Demographics Similar to Sudanese by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Fijian (32.3%, a difference of 0.42%), Colombian (32.2%, a difference of 0.51%), Irish (32.2%, a difference of 0.57%), Tlingit-Haida (32.2%, a difference of 0.59%), and Samoan (32.6%, a difference of 0.67%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
Czechoslovakians | 38.0 /100 | #187 | Fair 32.0% |
Osage | 37.1 /100 | #188 | Fair 32.1% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 36.9 /100 | #189 | Fair 32.1% |
Tlingit-Haida | 32.6 /100 | #190 | Fair 32.2% |
Irish | 32.4 /100 | #191 | Fair 32.2% |
Colombians | 31.9 /100 | #192 | Fair 32.2% |
Fijians | 31.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 32.3% |
Sudanese | 27.3 /100 | #194 | Fair 32.4% |
Samoans | 21.9 /100 | #195 | Fair 32.6% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 21.7 /100 | #196 | Fair 32.6% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 20.6 /100 | #197 | Fair 32.7% |
Costa Ricans | 20.3 /100 | #198 | Fair 32.7% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 18.9 /100 | #199 | Poor 32.8% |
Immigrants | Germany | 18.8 /100 | #200 | Poor 32.8% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 16.7 /100 | #201 | Poor 32.9% |