Immigrants from Jamaica vs Immigrants from Turkey Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 170,026,562 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Turkey within Immigrant from Jamaica communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.526. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jamaica within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Immigrants from Turkey. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Jamaica corresponds to a decrease of 7.9 Immigrants from Turkey.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (18.8% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 43.1%), median family income ($89,268 compared to $118,325, a difference of 32.6%), and per capita income ($38,766 compared to $51,368, a difference of 32.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,038 compared to $52,503, a difference of 2.9%), median female earnings ($38,625 compared to $44,066, a difference of 14.1%), and median earnings ($43,026 compared to $52,960, a difference of 23.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 72.3%), family poverty (11.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 39.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.8% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 7.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.9% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 8.2%), and single mother poverty (29.6% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (6.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 32.0%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (8.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 30.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 5.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.2% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 8.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.47%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.0% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 47.2%), births to unmarried women (38.8% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 37.9%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.4%), family households (64.7% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and average family size (3.33 compared to 3.18, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 28.1%), no vehicles in household (14.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 24.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.7% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.8% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 3.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (44.5% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 20.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.7% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 21.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 93.5%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 72.9%), and master's degree (13.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 51.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.58%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.60%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (6.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 24.5%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 23.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 1.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 3.7%).