Ethiopian vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison
COMPARE
Ethiopian
Zimbabwean
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Ethiopians
Zimbabweans
7,266
SOCIAL INDEX
70.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
126th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Zimbabwean Integration in Ethiopian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,568,951 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Ethiopian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.371. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ethiopians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.015% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ethiopians corresponds to an increase of 14.6 Zimbabweans.
Ethiopian vs Zimbabwean Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.8% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 20.5%), median female earnings ($43,243 compared to $40,798, a difference of 6.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,818 compared to $51,259, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,243 compared to $56,302, a difference of 0.10%), median household income ($89,640 compared to $90,618, a difference of 1.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,989 compared to $65,854, a difference of 1.3%).
Income Metric | Ethiopian | Zimbabwean |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,569 | Exceptional $45,804 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $108,251 | Exceptional $110,011 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $89,640 | Exceptional $90,618 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $49,572 | Exceptional $48,229 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,243 | Excellent $56,302 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,243 | Exceptional $40,798 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,818 | Tragic $51,259 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Good $96,824 | Exceptional $98,586 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,736 | Exceptional $106,849 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $64,989 | Exceptional $65,854 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.8% | Fair 26.3% |
Ethiopian vs Zimbabwean Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 25.1%), single male poverty (11.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 17.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (16.3% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.7% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 0.80%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and single female poverty (19.9% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 2.0%).
Poverty Metric | Ethiopian | Zimbabwean |
Poverty | Average 12.2% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Families | Good 8.8% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Males | Average 11.1% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Females | Good 13.3% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.2% | Fair 20.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.4% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Excellent 16.5% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Average 16.3% | Exceptional 14.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Average 16.5% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Average 16.5% | Exceptional 14.4% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.2% | Poor 13.1% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.9% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 13.5% | Exceptional 15.6% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.7% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married Couples | Good 5.1% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.8% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.6% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Ethiopian vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 19.0%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 14.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.60%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 3.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Ethiopian | Zimbabwean |
Unemployment | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Males | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Fair 17.8% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.5% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Good 8.6% | Average 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.0% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Ethiopian vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (69.3% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.2% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.9% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.8% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.86%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Ethiopian | Zimbabwean |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 69.3% | Exceptional 67.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 82.0% | Exceptional 81.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.2% | Exceptional 38.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.3% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 86.2% | Fair 84.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 86.6% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.9% | Exceptional 86.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.8% | Exceptional 84.0% |
Ethiopian vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (43.2% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 9.7%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 8.9%), and single mother households (6.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 1.0%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.1%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Ethiopian | Zimbabwean |
Family Households | Tragic 61.2% | Fair 64.1% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.2% | Excellent 47.4% |
Average Family Size | Good 3.24 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Poor 2.4% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Fair 6.5% | Excellent 6.1% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.5% | Good 47.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Average 12.0% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.8% | Exceptional 28.7% |
Ethiopian vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 15.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 13.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 7.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 11.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Ethiopian | Zimbabwean |
No Vehicles Available | Average 10.5% | Exceptional 9.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Average 89.6% | Exceptional 91.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.1% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.9% | Excellent 20.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.8% | Good 6.4% |
Ethiopian vs Zimbabwean Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 40.4%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and professional degree (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.70%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.70%), and 2nd grade (97.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.70%).
Education Level Metric | Ethiopian | Zimbabwean |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.4% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Exceptional 96.5% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.4% | Exceptional 95.9% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Exceptional 94.9% |
11th Grade | Poor 92.2% | Exceptional 93.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Fair 91.0% | Exceptional 92.7% |
High School Diploma | Fair 89.0% | Exceptional 91.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Good 86.0% | Exceptional 88.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.3% | Exceptional 69.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.9% | Exceptional 64.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 50.4% | Exceptional 51.3% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 42.8% | Exceptional 43.3% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 18.0% | Exceptional 17.7% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Ethiopian vs Zimbabwean Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 6.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 5.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.020%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.49%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.59%).
Disability Metric | Ethiopian | Zimbabwean |
Disability | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Males | Exceptional 10.2% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Good 6.5% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 22.7% | Exceptional 21.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Excellent 46.8% | Tragic 48.1% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.7% | Excellent 2.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.9% | Tragic 17.6% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 2.2% |