Apache vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Apache
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Apache

Zimbabweans

Poor
Exceptional
1,423
SOCIAL INDEX
11.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
309th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Zimbabwean Integration in Apache Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,196,048 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Apache communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Apache within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.893% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Apache corresponds to an increase of 892.9 Zimbabweans.
Apache Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

Apache vs Zimbabwean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Apache and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($34,886 compared to $45,804, a difference of 31.3%), median family income ($84,451 compared to $110,011, a difference of 30.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,184 compared to $106,849, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,395 compared to $51,259, a difference of 3.8%), wage/income gap (24.5% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 7.2%), and median female earnings ($34,895 compared to $40,798, a difference of 16.9%).
Apache vs Zimbabwean Income
Income MetricApacheZimbabwean
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$34,886
Exceptional
$45,804
Median Family Income
Tragic
$84,451
Exceptional
$110,011
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,927
Exceptional
$90,618
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,388
Exceptional
$48,229
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,429
Excellent
$56,302
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,895
Exceptional
$40,798
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,395
Tragic
$51,259
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,260
Exceptional
$98,586
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,184
Exceptional
$106,849
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,668
Exceptional
$65,854
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.5%
Fair
26.3%

Apache vs Zimbabwean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Apache and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (9.0% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 119.5%), receiving food stamps (18.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 92.8%), and family poverty (14.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 89.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (26.3% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 28.9%), single mother poverty (36.6% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 30.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 36.9%).
Apache vs Zimbabwean Poverty
Poverty MetricApacheZimbabwean
Poverty
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Tragic
17.7%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Tragic
19.2%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
26.3%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
20.1%
Exceptional
11.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
25.0%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
23.8%
Exceptional
14.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
24.5%
Exceptional
14.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
23.8%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Tragic
21.6%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Tragic
27.7%
Exceptional
19.5%
Single Fathers
Tragic
24.2%
Exceptional
15.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
36.6%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
13.9%
Exceptional
9.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.3%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
18.3%
Exceptional
9.5%

Apache vs Zimbabwean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Apache and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 94.4%), male unemployment (8.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 80.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (12.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 67.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 3.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 4.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 8.0%).
Apache vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricApacheZimbabwean
Unemployment
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Tragic
8.6%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
9.5%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.4%
Average
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
5.1%

Apache vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Apache and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (60.7% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 10.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (77.9% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 10.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.0% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 5.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (79.2% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 8.4%).
Apache vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricApacheZimbabwean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
60.7%
Exceptional
67.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
73.7%
Exceptional
81.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Poor
35.6%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.0%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
79.2%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
77.9%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
77.1%
Exceptional
84.0%

Apache vs Zimbabwean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Apache and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (39.9% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 39.0%), single mother households (7.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 30.0%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (29.0% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 3.8%), family households (66.5% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and married-couple households (43.9% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 7.9%).
Apache vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricApacheZimbabwean
Family Households
Exceptional
66.5%
Fair
64.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.0%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.9%
Excellent
47.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.46
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.9%
Excellent
6.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.2%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
39.9%
Exceptional
28.7%

Apache vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Apache and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 21.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 14.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.2% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.2% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 4.4%).
Apache vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricApacheZimbabwean
No Vehicles Available
Poor
11.0%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.1%
Exceptional
91.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Fair
55.1%
Exceptional
57.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.2%
Excellent
20.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Good
6.4%

Apache vs Zimbabwean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Apache and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.0% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 61.6%), bachelor's degree (28.3% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 53.1%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 46.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.25%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.26%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.26%).
Apache vs Zimbabwean Education Level
Education Level MetricApacheZimbabwean
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Good
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Good
98.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Good
98.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Good
97.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Good
97.8%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Good
97.6%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Average
97.4%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Average
97.1%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Fair
95.9%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Poor
95.5%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.3%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Exceptional
94.9%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.4%
Exceptional
93.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
87.3%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.1%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
80.7%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
58.0%
Exceptional
69.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
51.8%
Exceptional
64.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
36.2%
Exceptional
51.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
28.3%
Exceptional
43.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.0%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Exceptional
5.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.3%

Apache vs Zimbabwean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Apache and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.0% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 72.8%), vision disability (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 52.4%), and hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 44.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 5.7%), disability age over 75 (53.6% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 11.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 14.9%).
Apache vs Zimbabwean Disability
Disability MetricApacheZimbabwean
Disability
Tragic
13.9%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.0%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.4%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.4%
Good
6.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.9%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
29.7%
Exceptional
21.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
53.6%
Tragic
48.1%
Vision
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
4.1%
Excellent
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.6%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.2%