Blackfeet vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Blackfeet
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Blackfeet
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
9.6%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
91.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
123rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
82.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Blackfeet vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 309,020,066 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Blackfeet and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.008 and weighted average of 9.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,693,810 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.484 and weighted average of 9.9%, a difference of 2.9%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Blackfeet | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 0.74% |
| Maximum | 34.9% | 37.5% |
| Range | 33.8% | 36.8% |
| Mean | 9.4% | 7.2% |
| Median | 7.6% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.7% | 3.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.7% | 8.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.0% | 4.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.9% | 6.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 6.1% |
Demographics Similar to Blackfeet and Immigrants from Zimbabwe by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Blackfeet are Immigrants from Korea (9.6%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Cameroon (9.6%, a difference of 0.36%), Costa Rican (9.5%, a difference of 0.46%), Icelander (9.6%, a difference of 0.52%), and Immigrants from Kenya (9.6%, a difference of 0.71%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Sudanese (9.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.8%, a difference of 0.35%), Marshallese (9.8%, a difference of 0.36%), Estonian (9.8%, a difference of 0.40%), and Immigrants from Moldova (9.8%, a difference of 0.52%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Costa Ricans | 92.3 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Blackfeet | 91.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 90.9 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 90.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Icelanders | 90.2 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 89.7 /100 | #127 | Excellent 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 89.5 /100 | #128 | Excellent 9.6% |
| Nicaraguans | 89.5 /100 | #129 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Burmese | 88.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 88.2 /100 | #131 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Kenyans | 88.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 87.1 /100 | #133 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Syrians | 87.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Latvians | 85.1 /100 | #135 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 85.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 84.6 /100 | #137 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Estonians | 84.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Marshallese | 84.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |