Nicaraguan vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Nicaraguan
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Nicaraguans
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
9.7%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
89.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
129th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
82.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Nicaraguan vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,349,365 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Nicaraguans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.309 and weighted average of 9.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,693,810 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.484 and weighted average of 9.9%, a difference of 2.1%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Nicaraguan | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
Minimum | 0.83% | 0.74% |
Maximum | 28.8% | 37.5% |
Range | 27.9% | 36.8% |
Mean | 9.2% | 7.2% |
Median | 8.2% | 5.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.8% | 3.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.0% | 8.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 4.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.0% | 6.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 6.1% |
Demographics Similar to Nicaraguans and Immigrants from Zimbabwe by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Nicaraguans are Immigrants from Syria (9.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Kenya (9.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Burmese (9.7%, a difference of 0.25%), Icelander (9.6%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Cameroon (9.6%, a difference of 0.46%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Sudanese (9.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.8%, a difference of 0.35%), Chilean (9.9%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Bahamas (9.9%, a difference of 0.35%), and Marshallese (9.8%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 90.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Icelanders | 90.2 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 89.7 /100 | #127 | Excellent 9.6% |
Immigrants | Syria | 89.5 /100 | #128 | Excellent 9.6% |
Nicaraguans | 89.5 /100 | #129 | Excellent 9.7% |
Burmese | 88.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 9.7% |
Immigrants | Azores | 88.2 /100 | #131 | Excellent 9.7% |
Kenyans | 88.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 9.7% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 87.1 /100 | #133 | Excellent 9.7% |
Syrians | 87.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 9.7% |
Latvians | 85.1 /100 | #135 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 85.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 84.6 /100 | #137 | Excellent 9.8% |
Estonians | 84.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 9.8% |
Marshallese | 84.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 9.8% |
Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |