Costa Rican vs Burmese No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Burmese
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Costa Ricans
Burmese
9.5%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
92.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
122nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.7%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
88.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
130th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs Burmese No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,314,745 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.188 and weighted average of 9.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 463,501,030 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.116 and weighted average of 9.7%, a difference of 1.5%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Costa Rican | Burmese |
| Minimum | 1.0% | 0.54% |
| Maximum | 17.8% | 28.5% |
| Range | 16.7% | 28.0% |
| Mean | 7.0% | 8.3% |
| Median | 6.6% | 7.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.9% | 4.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.4% | 10.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 6.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.8% | 5.3% |
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans and Burmese by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Puget Sound Salish (9.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Thailand (9.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Fijian (9.5%, a difference of 0.21%), Greek (9.5%, a difference of 0.32%), and Blackfeet (9.6%, a difference of 0.46%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Immigrants from the Azores (9.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Nicaraguan (9.7%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Syria (9.6%, a difference of 0.28%), Kenyan (9.7%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Kenya (9.6%, a difference of 0.36%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Japanese | 94.1 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Chippewa | 93.8 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Greeks | 92.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Fijians | 92.7 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 92.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 92.4 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Costa Ricans | 92.3 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Blackfeet | 91.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 90.9 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 90.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Icelanders | 90.2 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 89.7 /100 | #127 | Excellent 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 89.5 /100 | #128 | Excellent 9.6% |
| Nicaraguans | 89.5 /100 | #129 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Burmese | 88.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 88.2 /100 | #131 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Kenyans | 88.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 87.1 /100 | #133 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Syrians | 87.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Latvians | 85.1 /100 | #135 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 85.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 9.8% |