Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Congo No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Bhutanese
Immigrants from Congo
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Bhutanese
Immigrants from Congo
8.7%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
90th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.1%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
73.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
152nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Congo No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 453,743,315 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328 and weighted average of 8.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,060,649 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.198 and weighted average of 10.1%, a difference of 15.4%.

No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bhutanese | Immigrants from Congo |
Minimum | 1.5% | 0.81% |
Maximum | 49.5% | 31.7% |
Range | 48.0% | 30.9% |
Mean | 7.5% | 10.2% |
Median | 5.8% | 9.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 6.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.3% | 12.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.3% | 5.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.6% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.6% | 5.2% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Cuba (8.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Germany (8.7%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Canada (8.7%, a difference of 0.22%), Osage (8.7%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from England (8.7%, a difference of 0.35%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Italians | 99.4 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 99.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Lebanese | 99.3 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Bangladeshis | 99.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | England | 99.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Osage | 99.2 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 99.2 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Bhutanese | 99.2 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | Germany | 99.1 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | Canada | 99.1 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | North America | 99.1 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Austrians | 98.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 8.8% |
Potawatomi | 98.8 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 8.8% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 98.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Immigrants | Central America | 98.5 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Congo by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Congo are Tlingit-Haida (10.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Sioux (10.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Salvadoran (10.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (10.0%, a difference of 0.14%), and Colombian (10.0%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 76.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.0% |
Colombians | 73.9 /100 | #150 | Good 10.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 73.8 /100 | #151 | Good 10.0% |
Immigrants | Congo | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 10.1% |
Tlingit-Haida | 72.5 /100 | #153 | Good 10.1% |
Sioux | 72.4 /100 | #154 | Good 10.1% |
Salvadorans | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 10.1% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 70.9 /100 | #156 | Good 10.1% |
Australians | 70.6 /100 | #157 | Good 10.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 70.2 /100 | #158 | Good 10.1% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 69.3 /100 | #159 | Good 10.1% |