Bhutanese vs Austrian No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Bhutanese
Austrian
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Bhutanese
Austrians
8.7%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
90th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.8%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
94th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs Austrian No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 453,743,315 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328 and weighted average of 8.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 450,345,618 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Austrians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.533 and weighted average of 8.8%, a difference of 1.3%.

No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bhutanese | Austrian |
Minimum | 1.5% | 0.94% |
Maximum | 49.5% | 100.0% |
Range | 48.0% | 99.1% |
Mean | 7.5% | 14.5% |
Median | 5.8% | 7.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.3% | 10.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.3% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.6% | 20.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.6% | 20.1% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese and Austrians by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Cuba (8.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Germany (8.7%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Canada (8.7%, a difference of 0.22%), Osage (8.7%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from England (8.7%, a difference of 0.35%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Austrians are Potawatomi (8.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Bolivia (8.9%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from North America (8.7%, a difference of 0.95%), Immigrants from Central America (8.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and Immigrants from Canada (8.7%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 99.4 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Italians | 99.4 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 99.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Lebanese | 99.3 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Bangladeshis | 99.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | England | 99.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Osage | 99.2 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 99.2 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Bhutanese | 99.2 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | Germany | 99.1 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | Canada | 99.1 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | North America | 99.1 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Austrians | 98.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 8.8% |
Potawatomi | 98.8 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 8.8% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 98.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Immigrants | Central America | 98.5 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Slavs | 98.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Bulgarians | 98.4 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Asians | 98.3 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Pakistanis | 98.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Yugoslavians | 98.3 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 9.0% |