Bhutanese vs Cajun No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Bhutanese
Cajun
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Bhutanese
Cajuns
8.7%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
90th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.4%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
70th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs Cajun No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 453,743,315 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328 and weighted average of 8.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,490,640 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Cajuns and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.102 and weighted average of 8.4%, a difference of 3.4%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bhutanese | Cajun |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 0.38% |
| Maximum | 49.5% | 21.2% |
| Range | 48.0% | 20.8% |
| Mean | 7.5% | 7.7% |
| Median | 5.8% | 7.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 5.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.3% | 9.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.3% | 4.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.6% | 3.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.6% | 3.9% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese and Cajuns by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Cuba (8.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Osage (8.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from England (8.7%, a difference of 0.35%), Bangladeshi (8.7%, a difference of 0.57%), and Lebanese (8.7%, a difference of 0.68%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cajuns are Immigrants from Lebanon (8.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Lithuanian (8.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Polish (8.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Cuban (8.5%, a difference of 0.95%), and Jordanian (8.5%, a difference of 1.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Cajuns | 99.6 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 99.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Poles | 99.6 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Cubans | 99.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 8.5% |
| Jordanians | 99.5 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 99.5 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 8.5% |
| Iranians | 99.5 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.5 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Portuguese | 99.5 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Bolivians | 99.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Tsimshian | 99.4 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 99.4 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Italians | 99.4 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 99.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Lebanese | 99.3 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Bangladeshis | 99.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | England | 99.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Osage | 99.2 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 99.2 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Bhutanese | 99.2 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 8.7% |