Immigrants from Egypt vs Indian (Asian) Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from Egypt
Indian (Asian)
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from Egypt
Indians (Asian)
5.2%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
70.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
155th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
84.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
136th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Egypt vs Indian (Asian) Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 245,194,116 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Egypt and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.142 and weighted average of 5.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 491,024,006 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.104 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 1.3%.

Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Egypt | Indian (Asian) |
Minimum | 1.9% | 2.9% |
Maximum | 11.7% | 7.6% |
Range | 9.8% | 4.8% |
Mean | 4.8% | 5.0% |
Median | 4.8% | 4.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 4.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.5% | 5.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.6% | 0.98% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.8% | 0.84% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.8% | 0.84% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Egypt and Indians (Asian) by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Egypt are South African (5.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Greece (5.2%, a difference of 0.37%), Immigrants from Italy (5.2%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from China (5.2%, a difference of 0.46%), and Egyptian (5.2%, a difference of 0.66%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Pakistani (5.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Latvia (5.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Chickasaw (5.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (5.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from France (5.1%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
Immigrants | Latvia | 84.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 5.1% |
Indians (Asian) | 84.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 5.1% |
Pakistanis | 83.8 /100 | #137 | Excellent 5.1% |
Chickasaw | 83.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 83.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | France | 82.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.1% |
Palestinians | 80.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 80.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 79.5 /100 | #145 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Norway | 79.4 /100 | #146 | Good 5.2% |
Argentineans | 79.2 /100 | #147 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.2% |
Asians | 78.3 /100 | #149 | Good 5.2% |
Egyptians | 78.3 /100 | #150 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | China | 75.9 /100 | #151 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Italy | 75.0 /100 | #152 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Greece | 74.9 /100 | #153 | Good 5.2% |
South Africans | 70.8 /100 | #154 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 70.0 /100 | #155 | Good 5.2% |