Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Sweden Male Poverty
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Immigrants from Sweden
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Zimbabweans
Immigrants from Sweden
10.2%
MALE POVERTY
97.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
65th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.3%
MALE POVERTY
95.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
83rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Sweden Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,180,294 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.027 and weighted average of 10.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,680,167 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sweden and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.396 and weighted average of 10.3%, a difference of 1.5%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Zimbabwean | Immigrants from Sweden |
| Minimum | 1.2% | 0.65% |
| Maximum | 18.8% | 23.6% |
| Range | 17.7% | 23.0% |
| Mean | 8.1% | 10.2% |
| Median | 8.3% | 8.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 6.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.1% | 16.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 10.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 6.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 5.9% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans and Immigrants from Sweden by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Serbian (10.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Swiss (10.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Netherlands (10.2%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (10.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Australia (10.2%, a difference of 0.37%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sweden are Czechoslovakian (10.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Egyptian (10.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Belgian (10.3%, a difference of 0.13%), English (10.3%, a difference of 0.52%), and Immigrants from North America (10.3%, a difference of 0.60%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Swiss | 97.5 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Zimbabweans | 97.5 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Serbians | 97.5 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.3 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 97.2 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 97.1 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Paraguayans | 97.1 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Europeans | 97.1 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 97.1 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 97.0 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 96.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 96.9 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Dutch | 96.9 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 96.8 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Irish | 96.8 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Immigrants | North America | 96.5 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| English | 96.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Belgians | 95.9 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Egyptians | 95.9 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 95.7 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Czechoslovakians | 95.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 10.3% |