Zimbabwean vs Slovak Male Poverty
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Slovak
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Zimbabweans
Slovaks
10.2%
MALE POVERTY
97.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
65th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.2%
MALE POVERTY
97.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
63rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Slovak Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,180,294 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.027 and weighted average of 10.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 397,408,255 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Slovaks and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.153 and weighted average of 10.2%, a difference of 0.30%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Zimbabwean | Slovak |
| Minimum | 1.2% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 18.8% | 35.3% |
| Range | 17.7% | 34.2% |
| Mean | 8.1% | 11.8% |
| Median | 8.3% | 10.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 8.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.1% | 14.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 6.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 6.0% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans and Slovaks by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Serbian (10.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Swiss (10.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Netherlands (10.2%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (10.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Italy (10.2%, a difference of 0.35%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Slovaks are Immigrants from Italy (10.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Austrian (10.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Ukrainian (10.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Europe (10.1%, a difference of 0.24%), and Swiss (10.2%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Austria | 98.5 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Germans | 98.3 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.2 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Estonians | 98.1 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Scandinavians | 98.0 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 97.9 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Ukrainians | 97.9 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Austrians | 97.8 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 97.8 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Slovaks | 97.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Swiss | 97.5 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Zimbabweans | 97.5 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Serbians | 97.5 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.3 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 97.2 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 97.1 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Paraguayans | 97.1 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Europeans | 97.1 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 97.1 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 97.0 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 96.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 10.2% |