Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Jordan No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Immigrants from Jordan
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Zimbabweans
Immigrants from Jordan
9.0%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
98.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
104th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.7%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
84th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Jordan No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,183,978 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.495 and weighted average of 9.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,152,945 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.263 and weighted average of 8.7%, a difference of 4.5%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Zimbabwean | Immigrants from Jordan |
Minimum | 0.49% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 37.5% | 25.9% |
Range | 37.0% | 24.6% |
Mean | 6.6% | 6.9% |
Median | 5.6% | 5.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.6% | 4.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.1% | 8.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 3.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.8% | 4.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.7% | 4.2% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans and Immigrants from Jordan by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Seminole (9.0%, a difference of 0.63%), Yugoslavian (9.0%, a difference of 0.64%), Pakistani (9.0%, a difference of 0.68%), Asian (9.0%, a difference of 0.72%), and Bulgarian (9.0%, a difference of 0.90%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are Lebanese (8.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Bangladeshi (8.7%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from England (8.7%, a difference of 0.39%), Osage (8.7%, a difference of 0.51%), and Immigrants from Cuba (8.7%, a difference of 0.65%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Immigrants | Jordan | 99.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Lebanese | 99.3 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Bangladeshis | 99.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | England | 99.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Osage | 99.2 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 99.2 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Bhutanese | 99.2 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | Germany | 99.1 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | Canada | 99.1 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | North America | 99.1 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Austrians | 98.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 8.8% |
Potawatomi | 98.8 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 8.8% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 98.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Immigrants | Central America | 98.5 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Slavs | 98.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Bulgarians | 98.4 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Asians | 98.3 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Pakistanis | 98.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Yugoslavians | 98.3 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Seminole | 98.3 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Zimbabweans | 98.0 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 9.0% |