Yugoslavian vs South African Poverty
COMPARE
Yugoslavian
South African
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Yugoslavians
South Africans
11.8%
POVERTY
85.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
134th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.7%
POVERTY
87.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
129th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yugoslavian vs South African Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,571,582 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.092 and weighted average of 11.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,558,592 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.854 and weighted average of 11.7%, a difference of 0.39%.

Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yugoslavian | South African |
| Minimum | 2.7% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 27.0% | 54.5% |
| Range | 24.3% | 53.2% |
| Mean | 10.4% | 10.7% |
| Median | 10.5% | 8.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.1% | 3.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.3% | 11.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 7.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.4% | 11.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 10.8% |
Demographics Similar to Yugoslavians and South Africans by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Immigrants from Western Europe (11.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Vietnam (11.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Peruvian (11.8%, a difference of 0.080%), French (11.8%, a difference of 0.19%), and Chilean (11.8%, a difference of 0.20%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Immigrants from Israel (11.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Ukraine (11.8%, a difference of 0.090%), French (11.8%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Argentina (11.7%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Norway (11.7%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| New Zealanders | 88.7 /100 | #121 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 88.7 /100 | #122 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 88.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Soviet Union | 88.4 /100 | #124 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 88.2 /100 | #125 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 88.0 /100 | #126 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 88.0 /100 | #127 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 87.4 /100 | #128 | Excellent 11.7% |
| South Africans | 87.0 /100 | #129 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 86.6 /100 | #130 | Excellent 11.8% |
| French | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Peruvians | 85.6 /100 | #132 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 85.2 /100 | #133 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Yugoslavians | 85.2 /100 | #134 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 85.2 /100 | #135 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Chileans | 84.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 83.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 82.4 /100 | #138 | Excellent 11.9% |
| Pakistanis | 82.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 81.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 11.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 80.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 11.9% |