Brazilian vs South African Poverty
COMPARE
Brazilian
South African
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Brazilians
South Africans
11.9%
POVERTY
79.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.7%
POVERTY
87.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
129th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Brazilian vs South African Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,736,461 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.123 and weighted average of 11.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,558,592 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.854 and weighted average of 11.7%, a difference of 1.4%.

Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Brazilian | South African |
Minimum | 2.1% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 33.9% | 54.5% |
Range | 31.8% | 53.2% |
Mean | 11.7% | 10.7% |
Median | 11.1% | 8.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.8% | 3.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.3% | 11.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 7.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 11.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.0% | 10.8% |
Demographics Similar to Brazilians and South Africans by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Basque (11.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from France (11.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Peru (11.9%, a difference of 0.22%), Icelander (11.9%, a difference of 0.27%), and Pakistani (11.9%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Immigrants from Israel (11.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Ukraine (11.8%, a difference of 0.090%), French (11.8%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Argentina (11.7%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Norway (11.7%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | Norway | 88.0 /100 | #126 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 88.0 /100 | #127 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Israel | 87.4 /100 | #128 | Excellent 11.7% |
South Africans | 87.0 /100 | #129 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 86.6 /100 | #130 | Excellent 11.8% |
French | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 11.8% |
Peruvians | 85.6 /100 | #132 | Excellent 11.8% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 85.2 /100 | #133 | Excellent 11.8% |
Yugoslavians | 85.2 /100 | #134 | Excellent 11.8% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 85.2 /100 | #135 | Excellent 11.8% |
Chileans | 84.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 11.8% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 83.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 11.8% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 82.4 /100 | #138 | Excellent 11.9% |
Pakistanis | 82.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 11.9% |
Immigrants | Peru | 81.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 11.9% |
Immigrants | France | 80.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 11.9% |
Basques | 80.4 /100 | #142 | Excellent 11.9% |
Brazilians | 79.7 /100 | #143 | Good 11.9% |
Icelanders | 77.9 /100 | #144 | Good 11.9% |
Syrians | 75.1 /100 | #145 | Good 12.0% |
Afghans | 74.9 /100 | #146 | Good 12.0% |