Yugoslavian vs Samoan Poverty
COMPARE
Yugoslavian
Samoan
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Yugoslavians
Samoans
11.8%
POVERTY
85.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
134th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.0%
POVERTY
71.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
151st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yugoslavian vs Samoan Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,571,582 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.092 and weighted average of 11.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 225,074,148 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Samoans and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.360 and weighted average of 12.0%, a difference of 2.1%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Yugoslavian | Samoan |
Minimum | 2.7% | 3.5% |
Maximum | 27.0% | 37.9% |
Range | 24.3% | 34.4% |
Mean | 10.4% | 12.7% |
Median | 10.5% | 11.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.1% | 8.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.3% | 13.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 5.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.4% | 6.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 6.8% |
Demographics Similar to Yugoslavians and Samoans by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Immigrants from Western Europe (11.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Vietnam (11.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Peruvian (11.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Chilean (11.8%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Switzerland (11.8%, a difference of 0.42%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Samoans are Immigrants from Kazakhstan (12.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Malaysia (12.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Germany (12.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (12.0%, a difference of 0.22%), and Afghan (12.0%, a difference of 0.38%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Peruvians | 85.6 /100 | #132 | Excellent 11.8% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 85.2 /100 | #133 | Excellent 11.8% |
Yugoslavians | 85.2 /100 | #134 | Excellent 11.8% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 85.2 /100 | #135 | Excellent 11.8% |
Chileans | 84.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 11.8% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 83.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 11.8% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 82.4 /100 | #138 | Excellent 11.9% |
Pakistanis | 82.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 11.9% |
Immigrants | Peru | 81.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 11.9% |
Immigrants | France | 80.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 11.9% |
Basques | 80.4 /100 | #142 | Excellent 11.9% |
Brazilians | 79.7 /100 | #143 | Good 11.9% |
Icelanders | 77.9 /100 | #144 | Good 11.9% |
Syrians | 75.1 /100 | #145 | Good 12.0% |
Afghans | 74.9 /100 | #146 | Good 12.0% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 73.7 /100 | #147 | Good 12.0% |
Immigrants | Germany | 72.7 /100 | #148 | Good 12.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 72.7 /100 | #149 | Good 12.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 72.3 /100 | #150 | Good 12.0% |
Samoans | 71.9 /100 | #151 | Good 12.0% |
Armenians | 67.6 /100 | #152 | Good 12.1% |