Sudanese vs Immigrants from China Female Poverty
COMPARE
Sudanese
Immigrants from China
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Sudanese
Immigrants from China
15.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
240th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
94.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
102nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sudanese vs Immigrants from China Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,113,357 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.475 and weighted average of 15.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,442,741 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 12.5%, a difference of 21.3%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Sudanese | Immigrants from China |
| Minimum | 1.6% | 2.6% |
| Maximum | 43.0% | 26.5% |
| Range | 41.4% | 23.9% |
| Mean | 16.5% | 11.9% |
| Median | 14.4% | 11.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.0% | 9.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.1% | 13.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.1% | 3.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.3% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.3% | 4.1% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Sudanese by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Immigrants from Middle Africa (15.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Sudan (15.2%, a difference of 0.25%), Nepalese (15.2%, a difference of 0.37%), Immigrants from Armenia (15.1%, a difference of 0.57%), and Nicaraguan (15.3%, a difference of 0.61%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 1.4 /100 | #233 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.9 /100 | #235 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Cree | 0.7 /100 | #236 | Tragic 15.1% |
| French American Indians | 0.6 /100 | #237 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 0.6 /100 | #238 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Sudanese | 0.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.4 /100 | #241 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Nepalese | 0.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Nicaraguans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Cubans | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #247 | Tragic 15.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Slavic (12.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Palestinian (12.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Latvia (12.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Tlingit-Haida (12.5%, a difference of 0.15%), and Scottish (12.5%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Palestinians | 94.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Scottish | 94.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 93.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Laotians | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Portuguese | 93.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 12.6% |