Immigrants from Hungary vs Immigrants from China Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Hungary
Immigrants from China
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Hungary
Immigrants from China
12.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
90.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
121st/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
94.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
102nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Hungary vs Immigrants from China Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,645,999 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hungary and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.179 and weighted average of 12.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,442,741 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 12.5%, a difference of 1.6%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Hungary | Immigrants from China |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 2.6% |
| Maximum | 29.4% | 26.5% |
| Range | 27.9% | 23.9% |
| Mean | 10.6% | 11.9% |
| Median | 9.8% | 11.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.6% | 9.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.8% | 13.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 3.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.1% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.0% | 4.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Hungary and Immigrants from China by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hungary are New Zealander (12.7%, a difference of 0.10%), Albanian (12.7%, a difference of 0.16%), Sri Lankan (12.7%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (12.7%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Russia (12.7%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Slavic (12.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Palestinian (12.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Tlingit-Haida (12.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Scottish (12.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Turkey (12.6%, a difference of 0.35%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Palestinians | 94.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Scottish | 94.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 93.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Laotians | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Portuguese | 93.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Paraguayans | 93.0 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Soviet Union | 92.4 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 92.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Canadians | 92.0 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 91.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 91.2 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.9 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Sri Lankans | 90.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Albanians | 90.8 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| New Zealanders | 90.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 90.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 12.7% |