Sri Lankan vs Pakistani Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Sri Lankan
Pakistani
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Sri Lankans
Pakistanis
15.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
94.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
114th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
92.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sri Lankan vs Pakistani Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 432,135,013 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.168 and weighted average of 15.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 331,174,379 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Pakistanis and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.683 and weighted average of 15.3%, a difference of 0.85%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Sri Lankan | Pakistani |
Minimum | 1.3% | 2.5% |
Maximum | 43.9% | 100.0% |
Range | 42.6% | 97.5% |
Mean | 16.8% | 23.5% |
Median | 15.3% | 16.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.9% | 13.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.4% | 27.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 14.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.0% | 20.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.0% | 20.0% |
Demographics Similar to Sri Lankans and Pakistanis by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Belgian (15.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Dutch (15.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (15.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Palestinian (15.1%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Croatia (15.1%, a difference of 0.34%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pakistanis are English (15.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (15.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (15.3%, a difference of 0.20%), Portuguese (15.3%, a difference of 0.21%), and Irish (15.3%, a difference of 0.31%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 95.0 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 94.9 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Serbians | 94.8 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 94.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Palestinians | 94.5 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 94.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Dutch | 94.3 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Sri Lankans | 94.0 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Belgians | 93.9 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 93.3 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 93.1 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 92.7 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Pakistanis | 92.3 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.3% |
English | 92.2 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Portuguese | 91.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Irish | 91.5 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 91.4 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Peruvians | 91.2 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Scottish | 91.0 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Norway | 90.8 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 15.4% |