Sri Lankan vs British Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Sri Lankan
British
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Sri Lankans
British
15.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
94.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
114th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.0%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
95.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
103rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sri Lankan vs British Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 432,135,013 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.168 and weighted average of 15.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 514,706,514 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of British and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.589 and weighted average of 15.0%, a difference of 0.99%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Sri Lankan | British |
Minimum | 1.3% | 6.1% |
Maximum | 43.9% | 100.0% |
Range | 42.6% | 93.9% |
Mean | 16.8% | 30.8% |
Median | 15.3% | 21.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.9% | 14.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.4% | 36.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 22.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.0% | 25.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.0% | 25.2% |
Demographics Similar to Sri Lankans and British by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Belgian (15.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Dutch (15.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (15.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Palestinian (15.1%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Croatia (15.1%, a difference of 0.34%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to British are Immigrants from Malaysia (15.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from South Africa (15.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Paraguayan (15.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Egypt (15.0%, a difference of 0.11%), and Romanian (15.0%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Basques | 95.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 95.7 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Paraguayans | 95.7 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.6 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 95.6 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 15.0% |
British | 95.6 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Romanians | 95.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | England | 95.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Chileans | 95.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 95.0 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 94.9 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Serbians | 94.8 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 94.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Palestinians | 94.5 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 94.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Dutch | 94.3 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Sri Lankans | 94.0 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Belgians | 93.9 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 93.3 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 93.1 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 92.7 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.3% |