Spanish American vs Immigrants from Ghana Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,807,072 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Spanish Americans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.695 and weighted average of 19.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 198,244,595 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ghana and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.078 and weighted average of 18.9%, a difference of 4.6%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Spanish American	Immigrants from Ghana
Minimum	0.37%	1.1%
Maximum	100.0%	48.4%
Range	99.6%	47.2%
Mean	27.9%	18.7%
Median	21.3%	17.2%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	16.4%	13.2%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	40.0%	25.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	23.6%	11.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	19.5%	10.0%
Standard Deviation (Population)	19.2%	9.9%

Demographics Similar to Spanish Americans and Immigrants from Ghana by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Spanish Americans are Immigrants from Jamaica (19.8%, a difference of 0.25%), Jamaican (19.7%, a difference of 0.68%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (19.7%, a difference of 0.79%), Chickasaw (19.6%, a difference of 0.92%), and Vietnamese (19.5%, a difference of 1.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ghana are Immigrants from Laos (18.9%, a difference of 0.37%), French American Indian (19.2%, a difference of 1.4%), Potawatomi (19.2%, a difference of 1.4%), Cape Verdean (19.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (19.2%, a difference of 1.6%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants \| Laos	0.6 /100 \| #246	Tragic 18.9%
Immigrants \| Ghana	0.5 /100 \| #247	Tragic 18.9%
French American Indians	0.3 /100 \| #248	Tragic 19.2%
Potawatomi	0.3 /100 \| #249	Tragic 19.2%
Cape Verdeans	0.3 /100 \| #250	Tragic 19.2%
Immigrants \| Trinidad and Tobago	0.3 /100 \| #251	Tragic 19.2%
Immigrants \| Middle Africa	0.3 /100 \| #252	Tragic 19.2%
Immigrants \| Guyana	0.3 /100 \| #253	Tragic 19.3%
Immigrants \| Western Africa	0.3 /100 \| #254	Tragic 19.3%
Immigrants \| Ecuador	0.3 /100 \| #255	Tragic 19.3%
Trinidadians and Tobagonians	0.2 /100 \| #256	Tragic 19.3%
Guyanese	0.2 /100 \| #257	Tragic 19.4%
Salvadorans	0.2 /100 \| #258	Tragic 19.4%
Ottawa	0.2 /100 \| #259	Tragic 19.4%
Mexican American Indians	0.2 /100 \| #260	Tragic 19.5%
Vietnamese	0.2 /100 \| #261	Tragic 19.5%
Chickasaw	0.1 /100 \| #262	Tragic 19.6%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	0.1 /100 \| #263	Tragic 19.7%
Jamaicans	0.1 /100 \| #264	Tragic 19.7%
Immigrants \| Jamaica	0.1 /100 \| #265	Tragic 19.8%
Spanish Americans	0.1 /100 \| #266	Tragic 19.8%