Immigrants from Congo vs Immigrants from Oceania Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Congo
Immigrants from Oceania
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Congo
Immigrants from Oceania
25.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
304th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
74.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
157th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Congo vs Immigrants from Oceania Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,983,877 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.486 and weighted average of 25.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 301,448,754 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.531 and weighted average of 20.7%, a difference of 22.4%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Congo | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Minimum | 6.1% | 5.6% |
| Maximum | 75.0% | 62.5% |
| Range | 68.9% | 56.9% |
| Mean | 26.6% | 27.0% |
| Median | 24.9% | 21.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 22.7% | 19.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 28.3% | 37.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 18.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.6% | 13.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.5% | 12.8% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Congo by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Congo are Immigrants from Dominican Republic (25.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Mexico (25.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Somali (25.2%, a difference of 0.27%), Potawatomi (25.4%, a difference of 0.34%), and Aleut (25.4%, a difference of 0.50%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 24.8% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 24.9% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 25.0% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 25.1% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 25.1% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 25.1% |
| Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 25.2% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Danish (20.7%, a difference of 0.11%), South American Indian (20.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Samoan (20.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Costa Rican (20.7%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Western Europe (20.6%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
| Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
| Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
| South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
| Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
| Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
| Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
| Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
| Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
| Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |