Shoshone vs Immigrants from Oceania Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Shoshone
Immigrants from Oceania
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Shoshone
Immigrants from Oceania
25.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
302nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
74.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
157th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Shoshone vs Immigrants from Oceania Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,449,019 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Shoshone and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.130 and weighted average of 25.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 301,448,754 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.531 and weighted average of 20.7%, a difference of 21.6%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Shoshone | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Minimum | 9.1% | 5.6% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 62.5% |
| Range | 90.9% | 56.9% |
| Mean | 39.8% | 27.0% |
| Median | 30.4% | 21.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 24.6% | 19.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 50.0% | 37.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 25.4% | 18.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.8% | 13.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.4% | 12.8% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Shoshone by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Shoshone are Honduran (25.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Blackfeet (25.1%, a difference of 0.26%), Mexican (25.0%, a difference of 0.34%), Somali (25.2%, a difference of 0.40%), and Immigrants from Congo (25.3%, a difference of 0.66%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 24.6% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 24.8% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 24.8% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 24.9% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 25.0% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 25.1% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 25.1% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 25.1% |
| Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 25.2% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 25.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Danish (20.7%, a difference of 0.11%), South American Indian (20.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Samoan (20.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Costa Rican (20.7%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Western Europe (20.6%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
| Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
| Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
| South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
| Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
| Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
| Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
| Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
| Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
| Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |